The phrase “insider threat” is frequently used to describe hostile insiders who deliberately steal, harm, or expose internal data or systems, however these individuals make up only a small portion of the overall hazard. Workers accidentally compromising cyber security or leaking data poses a considerably greater hazard to businesses. In other circumstances, a worker’s conduct may account for the entire breach; for instance, a worker may send a secret file to the incorrect client or misplace a flash drive with sensitive data in a public area.
What is Not Considered an Insider Threat?
Businesses invest funds in infrastructure to find and stop external threats. Even if they manage to get past cybersecurity measures and access internal network data, these dangers are not regarded as insiders. Specific trustworthy users with authorised access to the internal network are insider dangers. They have valid credentials, and administrators provide them access rules so they may operate with the required data. Because they are reputable employees, suppliers, contractors, and executives, these users don’t require complex viruses or tools to access the data.
An attack is not regarded as an insider threat if it comes from an unreliable, unidentified, external source. To identify any abnormal traffic behaviours, advanced monitoring and logging systems are needed to protect against insider attacks. In the past, controlling users involved blindly trusting them, yet the most recent cybersecurity tactic, coupled with data loss prevention (DLP) tools, calls for administrators and policy makers to view all internal users and apps as possible security risks.
What is a Malicious Insider?
Any employee, vendor, executive, contractor, or other person who interacts directly with an organisation is considered an insider threat. A malevolent insider is someone who purposefully utilises data misuse to hurt the organisation. Because they are aware that they must cover their tracks and steal or damage data without being discovered, malicious insiders are more difficult to identify than external threats. They are also more difficult to catch because they frequently have authorised access to data for work-related purposes.
Any employee or contractor could be a hostile insider, but they typically have high-privilege access to data. A software engineer with database access, for instance, might steal consumer information and sell it to a rival. It would be challenging to identify this behaviour because the the database is legitimately accessible to software engineers.
Insider Threat Behaviour Patterns
The majority of advanced intrusion detection systems and monitoring programmes use behaviour patterns (such as access requests) to identify potential attacks by comparing them to a baseline of regular network activity. These technologies could analyse network traffic with artificial intelligence and notify administrators.
Several behaviours that insider threats frequently exhibit include:
- frequent infractions of compliance and data protection laws.
- ongoing disagreements with co-workers.
- Low performance reports are persistent.
- Projects and other tasks relevant to my employment bore me.
- Misuse of expenses and travel.
- Interesting in projects not involving them.
- regularly takes sick days.
What Sets Insider Threats Apart from Other Threats?
It might be challenging to identify insider risks like workers or users with authorized access to data. These attackers have the benefit of legitimate access, which eliminates the need for them to go over firewalls, access controls, and cybersecurity infrastructure in order to access databases and steal information.
High privilege users have the potential to cause the most damage in an insider attack. These users are free to steal data with little risk of being caught. Not always are these users workers. Vendors, subcontractors, business partners, and other people with high-level access to all sensitive data can be included.
Threats posed by insiders
Insider threats are distinctive since the assailant isn’t always motivated by money. In certain instances, the attacker is a dissatisfied employee whose sole objective is to hurt the company. Insider dangers come in four different varieties. Even though they aren’t always malicious, they can seriously harm a company’s revenue and reputation.
These are the harmful kinds of insider threats:
- Sabotage: The objective of an insider threat is to harm a system or wipe out data.
- Fraud: When data is stolen or altered with the intent to deceive, the attacker’s objective is fraudulent and probably intended to cause business interruption.
- Intellectual property theft: Any private information that an organization holds is valuable, and an adversary attempting to steal it could lead to long-term financial harm.
- Espionage: If an attacker takes critical trade secrets, documents, or data with the intention of selling it to rivals, that information is susceptible to espionage.
Insider dangers can also happen accidentally in some circumstances. Typical scenarios of unintentional insider risks include:
- Human mistake
- poor judgment
- Phishing / Malware
- Unintentional participation in the crime
- stolen identification
- Convenience
Indicators of Data Theft
Technical trails can also lead to insider threat detection and data theft, but characteristics can also be signs of possible insider threats. These technical indicators can detect malevolent behaviour in the absence of other indicators as well as in addition to personality traits.
Technical signs that an insider with bad intentions is stealing data from your organisation include:
- large amounts of data that a particular user has saved or accessed.
- emails sent to a third party that include private information.
- Network and data remote access during off-hours or irregular work hours
- several tries to access websites that are prohibited.
- attempted entry into USB devices and ports.
- frequent demands for access to information that are unrelated to the employee’s position.
- bringing work equipment home without authorization.
How to Detect Malicious Insiders
Organizations that solely set up monitoring systems for external traffic risk ignoring internal network risks. To completely protect data and prevent expensive hostile insider attacks, it’s crucial to have the appropriate monitoring tools for both internal and external infrastructure.
The chance of being the next victim can be decreased by taking the essential cybersecurity precautions to monitor insiders. You can halt harmful insiders or spot suspicious behaviour in various ways, for example:
- Based on employee responsibilities and their requirement for data to carry out a job function, apply policies and security access.
- Keep track of both successful and unsuccessful access requests.
- Utilize monitoring and cybersecurity tools that can send alerts and notifications when users engage in dubious behaviour.
- Install infrastructure that focuses on tracking user behaviour to detect insider
How to Stop Insider Threats
You must constantly monitor all user behaviour and respond to issues if they occur in order to stop insider threats, both purposeful and unintentional.
Insider threats can result in a variety of problems, such as malware installation, financial fraud, data corruption, or the loss of sensitive information. Organizations should create an insider threat solution with six essential skills to prevent all these potential outcomes:
Detect Insider Threats
Discover dangerous user behaviour by spotting odd behaviour.
Investigate the Occurrence
Investigate erratic user behaviour immediately—not after days.
Prevent Incidents Real-time user notifications and blocking can lower risk.
Protect User Privacy
To uphold privacy rights and comply with legislation, user data should be anonymized.
Audit for Compliance
Meet important compliance standards involving insider risks quickly.
Tools Integration
SIEMs and insider threat management should be integrated.
Three Pillars Method for Managing Insider Threats
Businesses that seek insider danger frequently concentrate on bad actors. Despite the fact that the majority of cyber firms are aware that neglect is a problem, many of them begin and end their preventative efforts with mediocre employee education and anti-phishing programmes.
An alternative strategy, focused on:
- micro-segmentation, which enables the organisation to zero in on the “hot spots” of risk.
- A shift in culture reduces the likelihood of purposeful, coerced, or careless risk events and places the business in a proactive rather than reactive mode.
- An business may identify and stop insider activities far earlier in the threat life cycle thanks to prediction.
How Can ITM Help You?
IT Minister covers all aspects of Cyber Security including but not limited to Home cyber security managed solutions to automated manage Threat Intelligence, Forensic Investigations, Mobile Device Management, Cloud security best practice, Enterprise Network & Security Architecture, Application Security Testing and Cyber Security training. Our objective is to support organisations and consumers at every step of their cyber maturity journey. Contact Us for more information.