The simple combination of a user ID and password is no longer good \nenough to protect our most vulnerable information. Identity theft, data \nbreaches, malware, and malicious actors mean that digital security must \nevolve to stay one step ahead of security threats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Strong, reliable security in a modern government, non-profit, SMB, or\n enterprise environment isn\u2019t just important today; it’s mandatory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The best security must take into account the needs of the organization and the employee, balancing protection, encryption, and ease-of-use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
MFA uses several different factors to verify a person\u2019s identity and \ngrant access to various software, systems, and data. Typically, MFA \nsystems use two or more of the following tools to authenticate \nindividuals:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The advantage of multi-factor authentication is that, in most \ncases, it\u2019s very secure. The combination of a password, physical token, \nand biometric can significantly reduce the risk of data and software \nbreaches.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
However, if MFA has some advantages in securing user logons, it also has the reputation \u2013 sometimes well earned \u2013 of being a bit difficult to manage. Users need to be provisioned with the second factor (the first they memorize). For some end users, even setting up a mobile phone to receive a one-time password via text message can be an imposition. Still, MFA is safe for most organizations to lock down their networks and applications against unauthorized access.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The concept behind single sign-on is very straightforward\u2014users carry\n out a master sign-on to authenticate themselves at the beginning of \ntheir work period. Then, whenever they need to log into another piece of\n software, the SSO solution logs in on their behalf. The SSO solution \ninternally stores the various credentials for every piece of software \nusers need to access and then validates the users with those systems \nwhen they need to be accessed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The advantages of single sign-on include:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Disadvantages of single sign-on:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n MFA and SSO are both coming at the issue of security and authentication from different areas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n SSO is more convenient for users but has higher inherent security \nrisks. MFA is more secure but less convenient. What are the two areas \nthat can be combined to provide a solution that is both convenient and \nsecure?<\/p>\n\n\n\n That\u2019s the way the security and encryption industry is moving. Again,\n it\u2019s about the evolution of security. Some of the new approaches being \ntested and used include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The convenience of SSO combined with the security of MFA gives businesses security posture and confidence. In addition, providing users with the efficiency and ease that MFA and SSO offer means less password resets and help desk calls. Source<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n iTM covers all aspects of cybersecurity from Home cyber security managed solutions to automated, manage threat intelligence, forensic investigations and cyber security training. Our objective is to support organisations and consumers at every step of their cyber maturity journey. Contact Us<\/a> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The simple combination of a user ID and password is no longer good enough to protect our most vulnerable information. Identity theft, data breaches, malware, and malicious actors mean that digital security must evolve to stay one step ahead of security threats. Strong, reliable security in a modern government, non-profit, SMB, or enterprise environment isn\u2019t … <\/p>\nThe best of both worlds\u2014combining SSO and MFA<\/h2>\n\n\n\n